Defenders of the CWB say that without the board grain prices would fluctuate day to day and farmers would have to negotiate their own price. However this is exactly what opponents of the board want. They argue that through the use of the internet farmers could monitor the price and negotiate accordingly, this would allow the farmers the opportunity to make more then they would be able to with the fixed rate used by the board. There are also those that are in the middle and believe that pooling and negotiating a common price may be a good idea for some farmers, they should not be forced to sell their grain strictly to the CWB. These farmers believe in a dual market system where they can sell their crops to the open market or to the board. However this idea was already disposed of in 1997 when critics of the referendum said it wasn’t possible.
I personally see more economic benefits to having a free market however I’m not the one selling my grain. There is currently on online “vote” going on for farmers can determine the end result of the CWB. What this will be interesting to see what is decided as most young farmers are determined to seek possible economic benefits of the board being gone, while the old die hards just want to have a secure market to sell their product to. I guess time will tell.
Until next time,
Luke
No comments:
Post a Comment